InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 48
Posts 2221
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 01/28/2013

Re: Alleyba1 post# 21244

Monday, 01/12/2015 11:57:26 PM

Monday, January 12, 2015 11:57:26 PM

Post# of 24848

he believes SCRC will ultimately be doing business in China.


I never said SCRC wouldn’t ultimately be doing business in China. What does this have to do w/the merits of my post that you are replying to where I identified specific examples of where BS Schneiderman has over-promised but under-delivered?


It is beginning to sound more and more to me that you have been speaking gibberish as this stock continues to run form .085 to .21 on good news.


Please provide a link to an example of “gibberish” and explain the factual inaccuracies or flaws in any logic I applied. Or is “gibberish” simply a way to say that you don’t like it because it is not uber-bullish hype and shines a light on shady behavior by criminals that for some reason you feel should remain hidden?


Do you mean to say this company is not turning a profit? Are you saying the run rate on the compounding will not be $60 million this year?


Are you putting words in my mouth again? Please link to where I ever said anything like that.


Quite honestly Alleyba says that you continually post the same thing over and over again.


If you go over my posting history, 99% of my posts are in direct response to mis-information and deception that has been posted and repeatedly re-posted over and over again in an effort to lure more and more retail sheeple into buying and holding when conditions were dangerous to do so. So your assertion is in reality nothing more than an indictment of those who have been continually spreading the toxic kool-aid over the past 18+ months…


Libelous and scandalous statements against Joe Zampetti who cannot defend himself


(1)
Pssst… it’s not libelous if it’s true… …but the behavior of JOSEPH ZAMPETTI and his core of fellow criminal non-disclosing promoters may indeed be viewed as scandalous by some – titillating even…

(2)
So, pray tell, why exactly is it that JOSEPH ZAMPETTI is unable to defend himself, hmmm??? What exactly are the circumstances surrounding him not being able to respond directly and needing self-proclaimed members of “The Core” to speak on his behalf?


and the .055 stock and again Alleyba says the .055 stock was a gamble by the shareholders that put up THEIR MONEY AND TOOK A RISK.


Since we’re talking in the 3rd person, coolerheadsprevail says that this was as much of a gamble as covering all the numbers on a roulette wheel except zero and needing only to avoid zero coming up… …and that, once again, considering how much of a cash cow everyone in the pharma biz knows that compounding is, that at .05/share, JOSEPH ZAMPETTI and many if not all of his core associates who also violated Section 17(b) of the Securities Act and who also participated in this PIPE deal, were exposed to as much risk as they would be exposed to the risk of falling to their deaths from stepping off of a 3-inch high street corner curb…

…so you see where I had to repeat myself again just now? And did I initiate this? No. I am repeating myself to once again correct misinformation that SOMEONE ELSE is continually repeating…


What if the stock dropped to .02 then what would you be saying?


If the sp fell to .02, then I would say that those who purchased the .05 PIPE stock were fortunate enough to be the only shareholders to have a safety net that no one else was privy to, and that for the sp to fall from 1.05 to .02 but yet to have a loss of only 60% would be a situation that every shareholder would love to be in, and that they should be grateful for it, because if the sp fell to .02, I – along with everyone else – would have ZERO pity for those who held .05 PIPE stock because that would mean that EVERY OTHER SCRC shareholder on the face of the planet has been effectively and completely obliterated and wiped out because they did NOT have the opportunity to obtain the safety net afforded by 28M completely unnecessarily issued shares (almost 25% of the entire O/S count and approx 40% of the entire float, mind you) of 0.00 and 0.05 PIPE stock…


I think everyone knows about the nickel stock and enough is enough


So why is it that you think that if the .05 PIPE stock was so heroic that those who hold them are so ashamed to publicly identify themselves when they tout the stock to others? Just like the “heroic” pumping and promotion by JOSEPH ZAMPETTI and his core group of fellow non-disclosing criminal promoters – if they “saved SCRC”, why not proudly identify themselves as being the promoters? One would think that this would be the ideal situation where one would WANT to obey SEC anti-securities-fraud laws, wouldn’t you say, and bask in the adulation of the masses?

We don’t see Ironridge, Seaside, Typenex, or any of the other financiers posing as retail investors and relentlessly touting SCRC stock on public MB’s. Only JOSEPH ZAMPETTI and his group of core associates have done and continue to do this… …and we don’t see any of the other paid promoters that SCRC used failing to disclose their compensated status in adherence to Section 17(b) of the Securities Act -- and, once again, only JOSEPH ZAMPETTI and his core group of criminal associates have done and continue to do this…