InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 88
Posts 5985
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/19/2007

Re: Mr Sensitivity post# 20037

Monday, 01/12/2015 1:31:36 AM

Monday, January 12, 2015 1:31:36 AM

Post# of 97081
You may recall that I am in the camp that favours a quick Settlement.

And we all know, it Needs always 2 for a Settlement. Neither J&J can have any interest to draw this out much longer (regardless of how much Money they have) and it cannot be in the interest of DECN either.

To me it is clear, DECN would have better use of Money being paid into their Treasury rather than paying lawyers indefinitely. J&J would have all the Money keeping this case going forever, but then DECN should have much bigger Business priorities if the books are closed.

Sometimes in life one has to smoke the peace-pipe if one likes the tobacco or not and Terms are never perfect.

For me and my friends who are shareholders in this Company it is a chapter we would like to see to be closed and it certainly would not hurt DECN on the contrary. First DECN would get the credit for having taken the fight up and for having won. This as such would create a positive public-relation possibility you could not pay for. And DECN would have all the cash and more and in no Need for debt to finance their Business model.

At this Point, shareholders could follow the stock based on the Business Profile and not based on lawsuits.