"So in other words, you are also claiming that it is unrealistic that there would be a person with two left shoes also as you claimed?"
Not at all, I was merely pointing out that to a person with the two right shoes, the two left ones are invaluable, you claimed they were worthless. And additionally, you are the one now claiming that it be unlikely that a person would wind up with two left shoes, in fact neither of us made that claim initially, you just brought that item into the fray but IMO, it is feasible...
Now to put this whole conversation in context, for a company that provides VoIP services, these patents may be invaluable, just like someone looking for two right shoes when they only had two left shoes, that doesn't mean they are worth a quadrillion dollars but they could be worth a whole lot more than people think, perhaps less than others believe but still invaluable to someone or some company.
That is all I have been stating
As far as the frustration level in shareholders, I indeed have a shared feeling but as far as I am concerned, there are a ton of items in plain sight that have recently reduced this frustration, some of them as recent as today, all people have to do is open their eyes and they would find them. They offer a great deal of insight as to why this may be taking a lot longer than first expected.
As far as Sawyer stepping down, he did not leave the company so IMO, he did not run from shareholders, things change, circumstances arise, perhaps he realized this was going to take more energy than he had, maybe he or a close family member fell ill, who knows but he did not run away.
As far as the issuing of the shares, it takes a bigger man to admit a mistake, I don't feel like he did anything wrong, in fact I feel more confident in his character because he was willing to confront the situation and not bury it out of sight of shareholders. Here's how I see that scenario playing out, He took the reins of this company and was presented with a number of items that had to be cleaned up, one of them included some debts to multiple entities. He issued them along with the entire board, things appeared legitimate on the surface and then they commenced with some internal auditing that found some discrepancies. they then reported them to the appropriate authorities and have continued to deal with the situation in the appropriate way. For anyone that believes that the company can just revoke the shares, they would be wrong, there is a legal process believe it or not...
ATIAIHTSOTFS
