ScripsAmerica Inc. (SCRCQ)

[coolerheadsprevail]

Oh, JOEY JOEY JOEY… …you really should stop with this incessant “Open Mouth, Insert Foot, Rinse, Repeat” approach, as it really is quite unbecoming of someone who is supposed to be an esteemed official ambassador of SCRC the way you have been paid by BS Schneiderman and, by default, the rest of us shareholders to be – not to mention it is embarrassing to SCRC as well as to BS Schneiderman himself (assuming, of course, that he even realizes that it is something that makes SCRC look bad and SHOULD embarrass him, LOL)…

There has been much chatter that the stock has hardly budged as intensive sellin. dec 12th .1097 now .19 not bad 75% in 3 weeks pretty good. No we are hearing the rsi is heating up at 100. Which is it the stock barely moving or the rsi heating up???????

So when JOEY Z is finished demonstrating his stellar reading comprehension skills, we can go back and re-visit what it was that I actually said, which was:

”The “discussion” was very specifically pointing out that there has been many high volume days where the sp has behaved suspiciously and either ended red for the day or remained stagnant throughout the day in spite of the surge in buyers. And to this end, here are the real “facts”:

12/16 Volume of ~1.9M . sp closed prior day at .1239 but yet opened at only .1200 and saw significant selling pressure that dragged it down to .1171 before recovering to close at .143.
12/17 Volume of ~700k. sp closed prior day at .143 but opened lower again at .14 and saw more selling pressure that dragged it down to .1301 before recovering but closing in the red at .1399.
12/18 Volume of ~800k. sp closed prior day at .1399 but opened lower again at .1211 and saw more selling pressure that kept it down at that level before recovering but closing in the red at .1390.

In addition, nearly every day there is extensive selling pressure during the trading session that results in ridiculously low prints relative to where the prior day EOD print was, the opening print of the current day, as well as the EOD print of the current day. With all this buying pressure, that takes A LOT of selling to still create these types of headwinds to drag down the sp.

I stand by my comments that without the 28M shares of 0.00 and 0.05 PIPE stock held by JOSEPH ZAMPETTI and his obedient little CORE lapdogs, the sp would easily be deep into the .20’s if not .30’s by now…”

And to JOEY Z’s second point, seeing high quantities of motivated selling is not inconsistent with the sp rising over a longer stretch of time. But it is symptomatic with the sp either rising less than it should, stagnating, or even falling on any given day, given certain above average volume conditions. And it most certainly has absolutely NOTHING at all to do w/RSI.

I will say this the 17m shares of financing SPOKEN ABOUT ARE A MYTH. Where are the financiers???????????????? in 15 months we have not entered into any new agreements for converts??????????? Yet there is a poster at ihub who is making strong statemements of 22m plus 17m shares at prices from .0065 cents to .2790. And to boot he claims priced to sell at exact prices???????????? He is giving faulty information without question. In essense he is trying to create havoc.

Didn’t we just do this? Pssst, JOEY Z… …it’s in the SEC filings. All of them. This is like Groundhog Day the last time JOEY Z and his “long term CORE investors” (LOL, I just can’t hear that enough, LOL) had no clue about how the SEC filings disclosed the monthly breakout of when their own PIPE stock would unlock and they scrambled and scrambled and couldn’t find it even though I gave them clues and told them that the disclosures were in the EXACT same place in the filings that they always are each and every quarter – and they still couldn’t find them, and so they start to rant about how I was lying and making stuff up and then countless numbers of fellow CORE members also chimed in claiming that they all read the Q’s cover to cover and the data wasn’t there and I was lying, LOL… …an Emmy-award winning sitcom couldn’t be scripted better than this, LOL…

…boy, I simply continue to marvel at how alleged self-proclaimed “long term investors” who boast about being loaded to the gills with shares that they intend to use to retire to Tuscany in Summer 2015 (just a few months away, LOL!) with their 50-baggers from SCRC can make such material investing decisions without knowing a damn thing about SCRC or even knowing how to read a fundamental 10Q/K…

…and one more thing JOEY Z… …priced to sell simply means that the current sp level represents a minimum 40% profit from their cost basis as this is the typical (but certainly not always) minimum that folks look for...

he is a total ............ you fill in the blanks.

Well at least JOEY Z has learned to stop publicly using foul language and homophobic slurs like he used to, LOL – I’m sure that would have represented SCRC really well…

tHIS POSTER HAS ZERO CREDIBILITY AND IF YOU LISTENED TO HIM YOU MISSED OUT ON AN OK MOVE OF 114% THE LAST 3 MONTHS.

Quite the stunning tale of revisionist history – or perhaps simply illiteracy? Most likely a pinch from column A mixed with a dash from column B, LOL…

…Go thru my posting history and I have been advising folks that the risk-reward began looking good at .12 as far back as Q4’13, so those who have been heeding my advice from back then are doing quite well now, thank you very much – especially since by following MY advice, it meant that they had ignored YOUR advice, JOEY Z, to buy when the sp was rocketing up from .40 up thru 1.05.

Had anyone followed JOEY Z’s advice, they would certainly NOT be up 114% over the past 3 months. How so? Because had they listened to JOEY Z and his securities fraud-engaging CORE PIPE-holders, that would have meant that they bought and held anywhere from .40 up to 1.05, so all that this “114%” gain from .0934 to .1999 would have meant to them is that their LOSSES simply nudged down a bit from being in the red 90% to being in the red “only” 80% (if bought near the high end of 1.05 – but if bought near .40, then the loss would have dropped from 77% to “only” 50%).

Don’t you just love math, JOEY???

But I’m glad JOEY Z brought up credibility – speaking of which, explain again why any legitimate promoter would voluntarily elect to VIOLATE Section 17(b) of the Securities Act of 1933? You think it would have anything to do with the fact that he was PAID IN MILLIONS OF SHARES OF STOCK and he realizes that he wouldn’t be able to liquidate in an illiquid SCRC market unless he lures retail sheeple into buying his shares from him? And that they wouldn’t trust JOEY Z if they knew that HE and his fellow CORE criminals were the ones that the SEC filings disclosed as being the holders of all those millions of dilutive shares hitting the float? Nah, that would just be too obvious, LOL…