The Existence of Herbal Analytics Validates Everything???
Not by a long Shot! The IF's play out too many scenarios, as outlined on the post I put on the Affinor site this morning, giving clear examples of the multiple suggestions and implications of IFs. And the suggestion that the outcome justifies the suggestion??? Not at all. If I am a jewelry lover and tell my best girlfriend I want such and such items from the XY catalogue and don't know IF my boyfriend will buy them, but that I will get them one way or another, doesn't suggest the boyfriend knows at all. I may only be wishful thinking.
If the boyfriend decides that the Gold market is a good market to invest in through purchasing jewelry and goes out and, knowing my tastes and exactly what I would like, buys me Jewelry from a different catalogue or shop that is the same or similar...
Just because Herbal Analytics exists doesn't mean anything. Coincidence...Maybe. But consider the fact that as a Science Guy Nick figures out it would be a good idea to start a Lab?
When I personally saw Abattis had a licensed lab, my first thought was they would use it to mess with Affinor's Weed play as its obvious Mike seems to want revenge on every level. So to me, it only makes sense that Affinor would become involved with another lab to circumvent having to deal with Abattis. So a Lab is a Lab, is a Lab. They need doors, windows, microscopes and equipment. Are there things that are the same or similar in both. Maybe. To meet the same standards or requirements to be Weed Labs one would think that the government would want certain tests run, so probably there are. There are more labs than these. Do they have similar equipment or facilities...Probably.
Looks like a vindictive waste of share holders money and energy. Lack of feedback...keeping hush, hush...or now running scared?
