Followers | 20 |
Posts | 1722 |
Boards Moderated | 0 |
Alias Born | 11/17/2009 |
Tuesday, January 06, 2015 2:48:16 PM
Yes it was.
"3: wrong, by definition an inventor does not assign a patent to themselves. It is their patent and depending upon various arrangements and understandings it may be assigned to a company or to others. In some cases it must be assigned but that is dependent upon where one resides and contractual obligations."
You're incorrect. The federal government ruled in several cases that a CEO has a fiduciary responsibility to assign a patent to the company he works for when the patent is in direct line with the business that company seeks. Has nothing to do with state law. It's a federal issue. You can not be a CEO of a company that produces toothbrushes, then invent a new unique toothbrush and try to personally profit from it.
"4: against the law? Only under specific circumstances. In my opinion you believe it is always illegal. I suggest you pursue that in a court and see how your opinion is valued."
I don't have to pursue anything, I'm confident that an entity that is known for taking on public companies will take on the issue when the issue becomes profitable.
VPR Brands (VPRB) Reports First Quarter 2024 Financial Results • VPRB • May 17, 2024 8:04 AM
ILUS Provides a First Quarter Filing Update • ILUS • May 16, 2024 11:26 AM
Cannabix Technologies and Omega Laboratories Inc. enter Strategic Partnership to Commercialize Marijuana Breathalyzer Technology • BLO • May 16, 2024 8:13 AM
Avant Technologies to Revolutionize Data Center Management with Proprietary AI Software Platform • AVAI • May 16, 2024 8:00 AM
HealthLynked Corp Announces First Quarter 2024 Results: Achieves 8% Revenue Growth Over Last Quarter • HLYK • May 16, 2024 8:00 AM
Integrated Ventures Files Q3/2024 With Mining Revenues Of $1,983,250 And Positive Earnings Of $0.05 Cents Per Share • INTV • May 15, 2024 10:30 AM