Rock Creek Pharmaceuticals Inc. (fka RCPIQ)

[haysaw]

First, I would like to apologize for calling you a cheerleader. It was an errant assumption based on your needling into something that didn't involve you. While there are many, many delusional cheerleaders who attack any critical post that doesn't support their fairytale, you are not one of them.

Secondly, I told you I wasn't going to waste my time explaining to you what I opined on regarding another poster. However, having misjudged you, I will retract that. As far as the cutting and pasting comment, someone posted, verbatim, a definition (#msg-109430796) supplied by Wikipedia and made no reference of it. That was it. I was being helpful.

Now, are you challenging me on a source as to another, unrelated post (#msg-109541619), in which I responded "no" to several remarks? If so, I will only say that they are so ridiculous that they don't really need any more explanation. But you want an answer, so here it is. Tissue studies at this stage would be for toxicology...not for efficacy. That should be the end of it. But if I am wrong, and they are looking for inflammation markers to furnish to the FDA for some form of efficacy, a good 'tissue' result would still not virtually mean a successful PhII, nor would it even remotely equate to a drug approval. I feel that, given my prior experience investing in biotech, that that is simple common sense. Finally, as far as them having a partner, would that be a material event? If so, would they be required to announce that? The answers: Yes and Yes.

Regarding your other points: I am not trying to be clever for the sake of being clever; I am not being negative per se -- it is a reaction to the ignorant and misleading posts I sometimes encounter. If I thought those posts were simply innocent but misinformed, I would take a different approach. But there is a cult-like atmosphere of exaggerated, false, and reckless babble, which is both whimsical and deceptive. Therefore, I feel compelled to act. I intend no harm. I'm not sure if the boisterous and blind longs intend harm or not either, but given the steady, withering decline of the stock, it appears to be a consequence. They have no hold on reality of what has been taking place, and what is really at risk.