InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 5
Posts 317
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/04/2014

Re: BeerIsGood post# 23721

Wednesday, 12/31/2014 10:51:34 AM

Wednesday, December 31, 2014 10:51:34 AM

Post# of 132328
Think what shocks me the most is that we all know that this message board is read by members of the BOD but apparently as one poster retorted they do not give a rats what is said on here, but why. Why would you not promote yourself, your company, your brand, your reputation and quash the naysayers with hard facts and evidence. No corporation big or small would let negative feedback spin out of control as ione negative comment is the equivalent of a 1000 positives. Or do they actually want the stock talked down to zero? Are there other motives at play? Incorrectly issues shares. Involvement with a company fined for taking advantage of people and profiteering. Qualifications more purchased than earned. Bizarre behaviour, wanting to sue for a film idea. Bitter infighting between BOD members. Promoter who has been likened to a time share tout. Good offers that would have realized .50 a share apparently turned down flat. Website details not correct and bit corrected for a long time. Promises made and not seen through. A whole ream of patents recently sold giving a rough guide valuation of 0.001. Blackberry recently applying for their own LI confident they can shown enough differences between patents to pull it off. Where are the positives? As a member of the BOD you really let your shareholders sit in the dark hypothesizing for months on end and that's all good?
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent VPLM News