DNAprint Genomics (DNAG)

[frogdreaming]

I certainly have.....have you?

They have never discovered a snp.

SNP 'discovery' in all of their documentation does not refer to the actual discovery of the snp but rather it refers to the discovery of the location of the snp on the gene. The snp itself is from the public database.

They do not 'sequence' in the accepted use of the word, they 'resequence' or 'review' the public genome data to confirm their 'discovery'.

As has been mentioned here many times in the past, the misleading use of terminology is NOT an accident.

By the way, this argument can quite easily be challenged. All you have to do is identify a single snp in the patent application that does NOT exist in the database. For someone of your obvious talent and skill this should not be a problem, should it?

Merely show us the snp and then show us the area in the database where that snp should (but does not) reside.

And please hurry, we are all atwitter with anticipation.