InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 13
Posts 347
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 05/23/2013

Re: None

Wednesday, 12/31/2014 8:04:13 AM

Wednesday, December 31, 2014 8:04:13 AM

Post# of 97360
Here is my take on the three posts below.

Wanka "$63 share purchase"

Proxy 5pid3r "$186" (should be $189, buying 630,000 @ .0003)

TraderLink "Confirms that they won't Reverse Split imo. It'd make their shares be pointless"

At the time these shares were bought it was trading between .0001 and .0003. Very few were getting ones so he probably did not get them. If you are so cheep that you buy 630,000 shares, you will not buy at ask when you can easily get them at bid. Therefore I would say he probably paid $126.

As for TraderLink's comment, I do not feel that loosing a portion of $126 in a Reverse Split would be such a large loss that it would deter the company from doing so. I am not sure what a Reverse Split would do for us. It could put us in a better market and give us more possibilities, but on the other hand almost all Reverse Splits end up in a continuing decline.