All American Pet Company Inc (AAPT)

[Leirum]

I did not say that I have correspondence in my possession. I said, it was shown to me and the reason why I have none in my possession is, because at the time of his corresponding with shareholders I was not a shareholder then, neither directly nor indirectly (Street Name) . But what I have stored are 2 Mails which were published in this forum and I would say, it covers all.

If one approaches this subject with no emotions one could see what some do not want to see.

In this sorry saga, everybody was part of it: E.Grushkin and the Management. In this saga there are no winners only losers.
Let’s go through it step by step.

Here 2 Emails:

The first from the period when E.G. and AAPT went to war. The second one from a period when all seemed well.

First a statement given by EG in 2013.


A) E.G. While I was still employed at AAPT, I also composed and delivered a letter via U.S. mail to all shareholders of record and as many private placement investors as I could contact by email.

B) "January I 0, 2013"


"Dear Fellow Shareholder,"

"Although I wholeheartedly believe that All American Pet Company, Inc. has developed"
"quality products and could grow into a profitable company, I regrettably, must now"
"inform you that I do not believe that the Company will ever be successful with the current"
"Board of Directors. I hereby solicit your support in demanding the immediate removal of CEO and Director, Barry Schwartz and President and Director, Lisa Bershan."


So far so good. In this Email from Janaury 10, 2013 he tries to distance himself from AAPT by actually saying: all would be perfect, but not with the present management.

But 6 Months before, the sound of the music was rather different with reference to the well-being of AAPT.

From: Eric Grushkin ([e-mail])
Sent: 26 June 2012 02: 05AM
To XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Great and insightful questions

1) We have made several press releases in the past and we will continue to do so as circumstances warrant. We pledge to keep our investors informed and most of all happy. The KS facility opened earlier this month and is operating well.

2) The Company is currently delinquent on its SEC filings. I can assure you that getting all filings current is my personal #1 job priority.

We very much appreciate your interest and support of AAPT

Eric Grushkin

CONCLUSION: One could then say, that E.G.’s Emails to shareholders were full of fabricated stories and the several press releases he refers to, as well. The text is not: AAPT or the Company, no his text carries the word "WE" means he saw himself as Person of importance within AAPT and his voice should be heard by the shareholders and they should trust him.

And by the way: . The Star Queens Transactions were not something that just happened, they were there, in front of the nose of the controller of AAPT and this for years and I have not found anything to the outside or a signed internal Memorandum which Shows, that he objected those Kind of Transactions. You cannot come out afterwards and say; those Transactions were not legitime, when during his period, they were legitime. And his text: I can assure you that getting all filings current is my personal #1 job priority. This text alone Shows: That he E.G. saw himself as the Person Nr. 1 in Charge for a very important file.



If those Transactions "should have been wrong based on his Statements in spring 2013" why were they then right in all those previous years? If most of the press-Releases from AAPT have been wrong based on his Statements in spring 2013, why were they then right in all those previous years. His Email from June 26, 2012 as a matter of fact, identifies him as part of the Club as he writes "WE".

And his calming voice to all at that time invested with reference to the filing-process gave a well-being impression to shareholders, that he E.G. is in charge and control. (my personal Nr. 1 job priority) Well well – not a small responsibility I would say.

But already months before this Email from June 26, 2012 when all seemed still in perfect harmony , the so-called white knight of innocence had his personal agenda already in store. Why else would he have registered a company on April 13,2012 with a name that sounded rather similar to AAPT. I would say as a hedge.

"...ON April 13, 2012 Eric Grushkin filed a Fictitious Business Name Statement in Orange County, CA for “All American Brands”.

Sounds very similar to “All American Pet Brands” doesn’t it ? What could have been Eric’s motive for securing this fictitious business name for his own personal use, and might it have had any bearing relative to his past efforts to oust Barry and Lisa from AAPT, and/or his departure from AAPT ?

Registration Number: 20126300118
Business Name: All American Brands
File Date: 04/13/2012
Expire Date: 04/13/2017
Business Owner: Eric Grushkin"

Somehow and for reasons not known to me, it did not work out with this business name. But of course the risk would have been to great so he found another name for a company but avoided to register his name.

See the below links to their website, and the State of Nevada corporate license info:

http://www.gawesomebrands.com/

http://nvsos.gov/sosentitysearch/CorpDetails.aspx?lx8nvq=FT5nEQiYFeCOtoc5u9qmBg%253d%253d&nt7=0

G THAT'S AWESOME BRANDS
Business Entity Information

Status: Active File Date: 12/6/2013
Type: Domestic Corporation Entity Number: E0585152013-2
Qualifying State: NV List of Officers Due: 12/31/2014
Managed By: Expiration Date:
NV Business ID: NV20131708317 Business License Exp: 12/31/2014

Officers Include Inactive Officers

President - LORI LACHENMEIER
Secretary - LORI LACHENMEIER
Treasurer - LORI LACHENMEIER
Director - LORI LACHENMEIE

Your unbiased vehemence in this sage reminds me of the question?

Who is guilty: The one who robbed the bank or the one that stood guard so the bank could be robbed? My answer to this: Both.

In this context: I Wish you only the best for 2015 and for my part, the chapter AAPT is closed for me unless the unexpected should happen.