Radient Pharmaceuticals Corporation fka RXPC

[guardiangel]

DC If you notice, the RCE Radient filed in February 2013..Radient became a void corporation on March 1, 2013..Here is a link from USPTO..If the patent is considered abandoned by the USPTO before the allotted time..Radient can re-instate Radient in Delaware for an appeal...The reason is Radient can state that they could not file a RCE within the 6 month window...Therefore re-instating the corporation they can continue after the final rejection after an appeal is accepted......The reply was unavoidable because the corporation was void after March 1, 2013..As you can see from the patent history, Radient and the attorneys did not send any documentations after February 2013..The only events were the change of address and attorney resigning..It was all done by the attorney on record..The reason they quit is because they got notice on May 6, 2014 stating from the May 6, 2014 8-K that Radient was insolvent..That is why they petitioned the USPTO on May 7, 2014..imo Wolf

http://www.bitlaw.com/source/37cfr/1_137.html


1.137 Revival of abandoned application, terminated or limited reexamination prosecution, or lapsed patent.

(a) Unavoidable. If the delay in reply by applicant or patent owner was unavoidable, a petition may be filed pursuant to this paragraph to revive an abandoned application, a reexamination prosecution terminated under §§ 1.550(d) or 1.957(b) or limited under § 1.957(c), or a lapsed patent. A grantable petition pursuant to this paragraph must be accompanied by:
(1) The reply required to the outstanding Office action or notice, unless previously filed;
(2) The petition fee as set forth in § 1.17(l);
(3) A showing to the satisfaction of the Director that the entire delay in filing the required reply from the due date for the reply until the filing of a grantable petition pursuant to this paragraph was unavoidable; and
(4) Any terminal disclaimer (and fee as set forth in § 1.20(d)) required pursuant to paragraph (d) of this section.
(b) Unintentional. If the delay in reply by applicant or patent owner was unintentional, a petition may be filed pursuant to this paragraph to revive an abandoned application, a reexamination prosecution terminated under §§ 1.550(d) or 1.957(b) or limited under § 1.957(c), or a lapsed patent. A grantable petition pursuant to this paragraph must be accompanied by:
(1) The reply required to the outstanding Office action or notice, unless previously filed;
(2) The petition fee as set forth in § 1.17(m);
(3) A statement that the entire delay in filing the required reply from the due date for the reply until the filing of a grantable petition pursuant to this paragraph was unintentional. The Director may require additional information where there is a question whether the delay was unintentional; and
(4) Any terminal disclaimer (and fee as set forth in § 1.20(d)) required pursuant to paragraph (d) of this section.
(c) Reply. In a nonprovisional application abandoned for failure to prosecute, the required reply may be met by the filing of a continuing application. In a nonprovisional utility or plant application filed on or after June 8, 1995, and abandoned for failure to prosecute, the required reply may also be met by the filing of a request for continued examination in compliance with § 1.114. In an application or patent, abandoned or lapsed for failure to pay the issue fee or any portion thereof, the required reply must include payment of the issue fee or any outstanding balance. In an application, abandoned for failure to pay the publication fee, the required reply must include payment of the publication fee.
(d) Terminal disclaimer.
(1) Any petition to revive pursuant to this section in a design application must be accompanied by a terminal disclaimer and fee as set forth in § 1.321 dedicating to the public a terminal part of the term of any patent granted thereon equivalent to the period of abandonment of the application. Any petition to revive pursuant to this section in either a utility or plant application filed before June 8, 1995, must be accompanied by a terminal disclaimer and fee as set forth in § 1.321 dedicating to the public a terminal part of the term of any patent granted thereon equivalent to the lesser of:
(i) The period of abandonment of the application; or
(ii) The period extending beyond twenty years from the date on which the application for the patent was filed in the United States or, if the application contains a specific reference to an earlier filed application(s) under 35 U.S.C. 120, 121, or 365(c), from the date on which the earliest such application was filed.
(2) Any terminal disclaimer pursuant to paragraph (d)(1) of this section must also apply to any patent granted on a continuing utility or plant application filed before June 8, 1995, or a continuing design application, that contains a specific reference under 35 U.S.C. 120, 121, or 365(c) to the application for which revival is sought.
(3) The provisions of paragraph (d)(1) of this section do not apply to applications for which revival is sought solely for purposes of copendency with a utility or plant application filed on or after June 8, 1995, to lapsed patents, to reissue applications, or to reexamination proceedings.
(e) Request for reconsideration. Any request for reconsideration or review of a decision refusing to revive an abandoned application, a terminated or limited reexamination prosecution, or lapsed patent upon petition filed pursuant to this section, to be considered timely, must be filed within two months of the decision refusing to revive or within such time as set in the decision. Unless a decision indicates otherwise, this time period may be extended under:
(1) The provisions of § 1.136 for an abandoned application or lapsed patent;
(2) The provisions of § 1.550(c) for a terminated ex parte reexamination prosecution, where the ex parte reexamination was filed under § 1.510; or
(3) The provisions of § 1.956 for a terminated inter partes reexamination prosecution or an inter partes reexamination limited as to further prosecution, where the inter partes reexamination was filed under § 1.913.
(f) Abandonment for failure to notify the Office of a foreign filing: A nonprovisional application abandoned pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 122(b)(2)(B)(iii) for failure to timely notify the Office of the filing of an application in a foreign country or under a multinational treaty that requires publication of applications eighteen months after filing, may be revived only pursuant to paragraph (b) of this section. The reply requirement of paragraph (c) of this section is met by the notification of such filing in a foreign country or under a multinational treaty, but the filing of a petition under this section will not operate to stay any period for reply that may be running against the application.
(g) Provisional applications: A provisional application, abandoned for failure to timely respond to an Office requirement, may be revived pursuant to this section. Subject to the provisions of 35 U.S.C. 119(e)(3) and § 1.7(b), a provisional application will not be regarded as pending after twelve months from its filing date under any circumstances.

[47 FR 41277, Sept. 17, 1982, effective Oct. 1, 1982; para. (b) 48 FR 2713, Jan. 20, 1983, effective Feb. 27, 1983; paras. (a) - (c), paras. (d) & (e) added, 58 FR 44277, Aug. 20,1993, effective Sept. 20, 1993; para. (c) revised, 60 FR 20195, Apr. 25, 1995, effective June 8, 1995; revised, 62 FR 53131, Oct. 10, 1997, effective Dec. 1, 1997; para. (c) revised, 65 FR 54604, Sept. 8, 2000, effective Sept. 8, 2000; revised, 65 FR 57024, Sept. 20, 2000, effective Nov. 29, 2000; para. (d)(3) revised, 69 FR 56481, Sept. 21, 2004, effective Sept. 21, 2004; heading, paras. (a) introductory text, (b) introductory text, and (e) revised, 72 FR 18892, Apr. 16, 2007, effective May 16, 2007]

***************************************************************

06-30-2014 PETDEC Petition Decision PROSECUTION 2
06-27-2014 N570 Communication - Re: Power of Attorney (PTOL-308) PROSECUTION 1
06-24-2014 CTFR Final Rejection PROSECUTION 11
06-24-2014 FWCLM Index of Claims PROSECUTION 1
06-24-2014 SRFW Search information including classification, databases and other search related notes PROSECUTION 1
06-23-2014 PET.POA.WDRW Petition to withdraw attorney or agent (SB83) PROSECUTION 3
06-23-2014 R3.73B Assignee showing of ownership per 37 CFR 3.73. PROSECUTION 2
06-23-2014 N417 EFS Acknowledgment Receipt PROSECUTION 2
06-17-2014 PETDEC Petition Decision PROSECUTION 2
05-07-2014 PET.POA.WDRW Petition to withdraw attorney or agent (SB83) PROSECUTION 3
05-07-2014 N417 EFS Acknowledgment Receipt PROSECUTION 2

Radient Void Corporation on March 1, 2013


02-28-2013 IDS Information Disclosure Statement (IDS) Form (SB08) PROSECUTION 4
02-28-2013 TRAN.LET Transmittal Letter PROSECUTION 2
02-28-2013 NPL Non Patent Literature PRIOR ART 4
02-28-2013 NPL Non Patent Literature PRIOR ART 9
02-28-2013 N417 EFS Acknowledgment Receipt PROSECUTION 2
02-27-2013 INTV.SUM.APP Applicant Initiated Interview Summary (PTOL-413) PROSECUTION 4
02-15-2013 RCEX Request for Continued Examination (RCE) PROSECUTION 3
02-15-2013 AMSB Amendment Submitted/Entered with Filing of CPA/RCE PROSECUTION 1
02-15-2013 CLM Claims PROSECUTION 3
02-15-2013 REM Applicant Arguments/Remarks Made in an Amendment PROSECUTION 6
02-15-2013 WFEE Fee Worksheet (SB06) PROSECUTION 2
02-15-2013 N417 EFS Acknowledgment Receipt PROSECUTION 2
02-15-2013 WFEE Fee Worksheet (SB06) PROSECUTION 1
08-17-2012 CTFR Final Rejection PROSECUTION