The thing that amazes about the Amended 10-Q is that the document refers to the stock split as being effected (see capital stock notes in 10-Q), but no mention of the fact that FINRA has rejected the effectiveness of the split.
The objection of FINRA is a material fact/event that would require disclosure in a SEC filing. Just another example of whomever is advising MS (or MS himself) doesn't have a handle on compliance with Securities Law.
If he is going back to FINRA to reapply, I would not be thumbing my nose at them in a 10-Q. They don't particularly like issuers who ignore their decisions.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.