Wednesday, December 24, 2014 1:19:44 PM
HTI/AHS, until the judge rules on their motion to withdraw anyway,
so I am sure that they appeared. Hence, HTI/AHS appeared.
Also sure that McManus representing Process appeared as they have two motions pending awaiting decisions. One being that they object to the withdrawal of Asa as it will only drag things out further.
Interesting that in their motion objecting to the withdrawal, they state: "Financial burden has been an issue since the time W. Asa Hutchinson entered his appearance on their behalf." [behalf of HTI/AHS]
To me that implies that if you weren't getting paid from the start,
what difference does it make now? Finish the case and be done with it. Makes sense.
Branded Legacy, Inc. Unveils Collaboration with Celebrity Tattoo Artist Kat Tat for New Tattoo Aftercare Product • BLEG • May 22, 2024 8:30 AM
"Defo's Morning Briefing" Set to Debut for "GreenliteTV" • GRNL • May 21, 2024 2:28 PM
North Bay Resources Announces 50/50 JV at Fran Gold Project, British Columbia; Initiates NI 43-101 Resources Estimate and Bulk Sample • NBRI • May 21, 2024 9:07 AM
Greenlite Ventures Inks Deal to Acquire No Limit Technology • GRNL • May 17, 2024 3:00 PM
Music Licensing, Inc. (OTC: SONG) Subsidiary Pro Music Rights Secures Final Judgment of $114,081.30 USD, Demonstrating Strength of Licensing Agreements • SONGD • May 17, 2024 11:00 AM
VPR Brands (VPRB) Reports First Quarter 2024 Financial Results • VPRB • May 17, 2024 8:04 AM