Seafarer Exploration Corp (SFRX)

[Raider21]

Precisely. The state is interested in unique, possibly one of a kind historically important artifacts. So do you think it prudent that SFRX bears the responsibility to remove coral encrustations and preserve these items? If the terms of the contract are a no liability to the company (as I posted before) all well and good. Being direct, as I see it, this company in the years they've been in business, have yet to have this experience. The highly "esteemed" archaeologist the company has on payroll are not shipwreck finders and have not dealt with major divisions with the State of Florida relating to rare artifacts selected or to be selected by the State. If I'm wrong please be specific in citing the example proving otherwise. Sinclair is the only one coming close to what I'm trying to point out.