Friday, December 19, 2014 9:37:03 AM
Now, however, the Government seeks once again to bring this case to a halt, this time
pending resolution of the appeals from the district court’s decision in Perry. But just as there
was no legitimate basis to stay this case at its outset pending the resolution of actions challenging
the Net Worth Sweep in the D.D.C., there is no “pressing need” to stay this case now pending
resolution of the appeals from the D.D.C.’s judgment dismissing challenges to the Net Worth
Sweep. The Government has not carried its heavy burden to justify a stay, and its motion should
be denied.
https://timhoward717.files.wordpress.com/2014/12/121814-redacted-response-in-opposition-to-defendant_s-motion-to-stay-all-proceedings-2.pdf
QUESTIONS PRESENTED
1. Whether the Government has demonstrated (a) a pressing need for an indefinite
stay of all proceedings in this action, and (b) that the balance of interests weighs in favor of such
Case 1:13-cv-00465-MMS Document 118-1 Filed 12/18/14 Page 5 of 392
a stay.
NanoViricides Reports that the Phase I NV-387 Clinical Trial is Completed Successfully and Data Lock is Expected Soon • NNVC • May 2, 2024 10:07 AM
ILUS Files Form 10-K and Provides Shareholder Update • ILUS • May 2, 2024 8:52 AM
Avant Technologies Names New CEO Following Acquisition of Healthcare Technology and Data Integration Firm • AVAI • May 2, 2024 8:00 AM
Bantec Engaged in a Letter of Intent to Acquire a Small New Jersey Based Manufacturing Company • BANT • May 1, 2024 10:00 AM
Cannabix Technologies to Deliver Breath Logix Alcohol Screening Device to Australia • BLO • Apr 30, 2024 8:53 AM
Hydromer, Inc. Reports Preliminary Unaudited Financial Results for First Quarter 2024 • HYDI • Apr 29, 2024 9:10 AM