InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 57
Posts 9416
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 12/30/2005

Re: TRUISM post# 85931

Friday, 12/19/2014 12:19:53 AM

Friday, December 19, 2014 12:19:53 AM

Post# of 276089
The subject is financing, not what the company is producing or doing, necessarily. Apples to apples would not be a company Blackrock would be financing. Apples to apples would be a developmental company not making revenues, OTC stock, dilution occurring, market cap of 31.6M, 2-10 cent stock etc..... If something is bad, what is the standard or frame of reference? If anyone is going to say a company has bad dilution....We need to know who has better. Are they competent to know the difference? Otherwise they are not talking out of their mouth.

How many times does someone have to make the argument about dilution and our supposed raw deal, before we ask for a frame of reference? Apparently quite a few times.

There must be a company that is famous for funding companies and giving great terms, for this discussion to go on and on. If it can't be produced, then they can't tell you KBLB is getting a raw deal. We are either talking about reality, or someones idea of a perfect world, which is never reality.

The fact is.... "better" hasn't been shown, so someone is complaining because they didn't like Kim for personal reasons or what....? Is some white knight going to give KBLB a free carry?
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent KBLB News