Thursday, December 18, 2014 7:35:00 PM
I am w/ you all the way on all of your points.
I think the biggest "what if" is: can App continue its operations @ $60 oil. If not, JW can be in a strong negotiating position on ownership of the leases.
I know I have brought this up b4, but there must be some doubts in the minds @ Maximilian of App being capable of fulfilling the terms of the agreement.
My logic: If not, why such a harsh penalty? 75% seems awfully strong, IMO.
Happy Holidays to all
Recent DBRM News
- Form NT 10-Q - Notification of inability to timely file Form 10-Q or 10-QSB • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 01/16/2024 09:52:33 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 12/22/2023 09:25:07 PM
- Form NT 10-Q - Notification of inability to timely file Form 10-Q or 10-QSB • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 10/16/2023 09:10:22 PM
- Form NT 10-Q - Notification of inability to timely file Form 10-Q or 10-QSB • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 07/17/2023 09:21:07 PM
- Form 8-K/A - Current report: [Amend] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 07/11/2023 07:40:13 PM
VAYK Discloses Strategic Conversation on Potential Acquisition of $4 Million Home Service Business • VAYK • May 9, 2024 9:00 AM
Bantec's Howco Awarded $4.19 Million Dollar U.S. Department of Defense Contract • BANT • May 8, 2024 10:00 AM
Element79 Gold Corp Successfully Closes Maverick Springs Option Agreement • ELEM • May 8, 2024 9:05 AM
Kona Gold Beverages, Inc. Achieves April Revenues Exceeding $586,000 • KGKG • May 8, 2024 8:30 AM
Epazz plans to spin off Galaxy Batteries Inc. • EPAZ • May 8, 2024 7:05 AM
Moon Equity Holdings, Corp. Announces Acquisition of Wikolo, Inc. • MONI • May 7, 2024 9:48 AM