I don't need to see the Agreement, maronti.
Here's a little patent law for you.
Eyetalk365 can only file an infringement claim in its own name if the license agreement transfers 'substantially all rights over the patents' from REVO to Eyetalk365.
If REVO has retained effective control over the patents, and not transferred the necessary degree of control to Eyetalk365, then Eyetalk365 cannot file a claim in its own name.
And here's a single undisputed fact: Eyetalk365 has filed four infringement claims in its own name.
The conclusion is clear: Either the license agreement has transferred 'substantially all control' over the patents to Eyetalk365 OR the attorneys have made a rookie mistake by not joining REVO as a joint plaintiff.
Do you think the attorneys for Eyetalk365 are rookies?
I guess we'll find out when they respond to the claim, from Alarm Force, that Eyetalk365 does not have the right to file a claim as sole plaintiff.
Get it?
