InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 21
Posts 2884
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 02/18/2013

Re: loopy99 post# 12626

Tuesday, 12/16/2014 5:47:01 PM

Tuesday, December 16, 2014 5:47:01 PM

Post# of 38785
loopy you need to do a little bit of homework on DFI, DFMI, Panik and Dimension. DFMI was the one that signed the license deals with Iterated. Even though many here will say that it was supposed to have been done for TMMI's benefit, that all changed when, once again, TMMI couldn't hold up their part of the deal. Just like TMMI couldn't pay Iterated on deals that were made and changed monthly to help TMMI avoid calamity.

Frackedup is right. Iterated's lawyers did state that TMMI have the rights to nothing in December '96. The 2002 court case in Ventura County included a settlement wherein the judge ordered Simpson to give all copies of any VDK2.0 codec to the owners (DFMI). How in the world was TMMI using it in November 2011, per Cavanaugh's shareholder update?

It's on the Dimension website (Iterated's lawyer letter to TMMI) and TMMI's new management team being attracted to TMMI due to the VDK2.0 codec is on TMMI's website..