Tuesday, December 16, 2014 5:47:01 PM
Frackedup is right. Iterated's lawyers did state that TMMI have the rights to nothing in December '96. The 2002 court case in Ventura County included a settlement wherein the judge ordered Simpson to give all copies of any VDK2.0 codec to the owners (DFMI). How in the world was TMMI using it in November 2011, per Cavanaugh's shareholder update?
It's on the Dimension website (Iterated's lawyer letter to TMMI) and TMMI's new management team being attracted to TMMI due to the VDK2.0 codec is on TMMI's website..
Avant Technologies Engages Wired4Tech to Evaluate the Performance of Next Generation AI Server Technology • AVAI • May 23, 2024 8:00 AM
Branded Legacy, Inc. Unveils Collaboration with Celebrity Tattoo Artist Kat Tat for New Tattoo Aftercare Product • BLEG • May 22, 2024 8:30 AM
"Defo's Morning Briefing" Set to Debut for "GreenliteTV" • GRNL • May 21, 2024 2:28 PM
North Bay Resources Announces 50/50 JV at Fran Gold Project, British Columbia; Initiates NI 43-101 Resources Estimate and Bulk Sample • NBRI • May 21, 2024 9:07 AM
Greenlite Ventures Inks Deal to Acquire No Limit Technology • GRNL • May 17, 2024 3:00 PM
Music Licensing, Inc. (OTC: SONG) Subsidiary Pro Music Rights Secures Final Judgment of $114,081.30 USD, Demonstrating Strength of Licensing Agreements • SONGD • May 17, 2024 11:00 AM