InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 325
Posts 19225
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 02/08/2002

Re: None

Monday, 05/01/2006 5:43:48 PM

Monday, May 01, 2006 5:43:48 PM

Post# of 115222
Question: I read here that some one was disappointed in the 10k due to lack of revenue from production in fiscal 05
???
Zabaik... acquisition wasn't until 12/22/05 yr end for the 10k and then
Kylon was Mar 14th 06 1st qtr.
Neither would have had 05 production imo

**So what production would any have expected to see on the 10K when these two comprise the value of the Assets 4+Bil?

**Was there also 04 assets that should have generated a big chunk of revenue?

**One other question I have is that when I looked at the 05 10k, I thought I saw Long term *debt $4B = to the $4B of Assets that Parkin mentioned today.

**Also it looked as though $4B of Assets was listed on the "04" 10k as well as the "05". How does that work or did I misunderstand it?

** If we had $4B as of the end of 05 then Kylon in Mar 06 is not counted in Parkin PR today as it ws as of end 05. That being the case we must have assets wayyyyyyyy over $4B shouldn't we? Kylon is all additional assets.

I am missing something, he paid 4B to potentially get 4B?



TIA