InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 52
Posts 2539
Boards Moderated 9
Alias Born 08/30/2000

Re: Da ! post# 1875

Saturday, 05/19/2001 1:43:02 PM

Saturday, May 19, 2001 1:43:02 PM

Post# of 3174
Da consider using Bix's method. If you take the actual revenues posted and not the ARRR then it is 9M so you take the 1.4M x 4 = 5.6m would 62% thus taking the 12M x 62% you get a Project estimate of 7.44 for Quantum and the overall would be 27M x .62% would be 16.75M now anything over the 9M roughly is an improvement in revenues and work.

So depending on how we adjust the estimating variable the ARRR remains constant at 27M as a gauge for performance and shown in the filings.

This is why the SEC makes the last year numbers in the filing for a fair assessment for what the company did as compared to the previous year.

Now no analyst gets what Bix wants in his demand for certain corporate information outside the GAAP regulations. He knows he will not get what he wants and he knows it.

But you are right all his banter is showing people the growth of CBQ since 1999 and it si impressive. I also agree that it has grown from earnings to an absurd scenario but it is giving others a chance to show where CBQ has done very very well under the direction of Bart.

How about finishing the math and checking mine on the growth that I displayed from the previous filings.

CIIR cash & options

:=) Gary Swancey

:=) Gary Swancey

Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.