InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 2
Posts 66
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 09/26/2014

Re: $UPERMAN post# 32044

Saturday, 12/13/2014 2:40:24 AM

Saturday, December 13, 2014 2:40:24 AM

Post# of 39469
Well technically they have been given many more chances than that (3 strikes). Every time someone on our behalf has reached out to them is a qualified attempt for getting this matter resolved out of court. The fact that ING have refused to work with PFNO on this works in our favor. From my experience in my own lawsuits the "TRUTH" is often never part of the main arguments. The lawyers will find some point that they fell best supports their case and if a judgment is rendered in our favor the history of our case workers working to resolve this matter out of court will help make ING vulnerable to exceeding cost past the face value of the bonds (fake or not). The court system really dislikes companies that do not work or show any effort in resolving a case out of court. So when we (PFNO) shows the paper trail of lawyers, examiners, ect and no feed back from ING it can remove any money limits on the verdict. I guess the short of it is once our case makes it to court it's GAME ON...