InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 3
Posts 29
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/05/2014

Re: pire post# 106869

Thursday, 12/11/2014 11:46:21 PM

Thursday, December 11, 2014 11:46:21 PM

Post# of 136065
How could any of this be so complicated for some people? Wasnt it you that was furious over the Company backing out of the Kardashian store? Yes, the same one that just went bankrupt? Seems like the Company had extremely good insight because this company would now be bankrupt too wouldn't it Einstein.

New stores? They opened on Melrose instead, why are you confused?

Private Label? That was when they sold activewear what, 3 or 4 years ago!?!? So you want the Company to continue with a private label for a line they completely dropped? Why would you spend all of this money on a discontinued line? Huh?! What are you so confused about?

Lulu Challenge? For what??? They do not sell ANY activewear at all! Seriously, why is this confusing?

Closing the Robertson Store? Do you not read? This maybe a tough concept to grasp but in the June 30, 2013 report they state that the landlord was asking $9500 per month. If you can't read, have someone read it for you. Its in the second paragraph. Why is this so confusing?

Made in America ? The whole thing was a sham. Read the reports from the Company and you would not need someone else to explain it to you. Why is this so confusing?

So your entire wishlist would have seen the Company go bankrupt with that now bankrupt Kardashian store, sign a lease for almost $10,000 a month just to keep you happy? This is not rocket science ... or is it