Is this the same Russ Fisher who negotiated that reverse merger into Chinasoft?
I know you very well Despy and I tell you what I will apologize for the following.
1. That you got upest because you did not get stock but I numerous newsletters wanting stock to promote and to date not one of them has gotten stock and will not as long as I can have any say in it.
An amaizing fabrication on your part. I am upset that I own this stock. I'm certainly not disappointed I did not get more. You make this stock sound like its in demand. CBQI has 36 Million in the float and only 465 investors. How many of those shares sold today? Only 4,000. The fact that I do not own more is a result of my choice to wait till the company proves its capable of sustained earnings(which remain negative with depreciation).
2. That you lost 95% but I was buying at $12.50 myself 50% higher than you and I know investment institutions buying at $14.50 and they are not screaming. The market ran and crash and if you want me to apologize for that fine. Considering most of the market has crash 80% - 90% and by your reasoning that makes the entire market a P&D.
No. That I will not blame you for. I choose to buy into a fairtale on my own. I may not like the fact I got burned, but I do not blame anyone else.
3. for the low volume and wide spreads in the bid/ask and that the TA numbers proves there was nothing in the 144 that tqank it as you posted under Despy and later most of the same people show up in this 10K with their holdings.
Another invention? I honestly do not know what 144 your talking about? Cythia Jared? These folks cant sell. Only 4000 shares were purchased today? But that begs the question: Who's 4000 shares were dumped?
Now you want me to apologize for that which you have posted is inaccurate and fabrication or posted under a selective bias and total disregard for the truth Nope you got the wrong man
INACCURATE? FABRICATION? Everyone here knows the fluf 27 M comment was released at a time that the company knew its first quarter results were down 50%. You of course, being the IR man, would never apologize for any "misleading" press. That would require that you see a problem with that type of hype. You justify this action with BS about it being a guage. Thats where we disagree. Technically, you may be right. Its a guage. Its not a forcast nor is it an expectation of reality. But rather than shed light on realistic expectectations, this company choses fluff stories. Now this same company tells me that the 50% reduction in revenues is "solely" a result of discontinued operations. Ok, I will trust that comment for now. But when the day comes that point is proven to be a fluff comment to cover up a loss of core business, you wont owe me an apology. The apology you'll owe is to every shareholder of this company. I care less about getting one. I dont trust it anyway.
AI
