InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 11
Posts 1516
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 10/20/2014

Re: buffalop51 post# 19183

Thursday, 12/04/2014 7:41:43 PM

Thursday, December 04, 2014 7:41:43 PM

Post# of 47873
Buffalo ah ha, so you think there's a chance for full value! ( gest)

[ Again, nothing is fast with IMSC as they are too small and HAVE NO MONEY! Not sure what you don't understand about this simple calculus.]

I totally understand that. Its been painfully long and expensive. But you miss my point- that pain and expense can now be spread out via follow on products, redevelopment of existing products ( rehab was the wrong word but you now get the meaning) and or substance library software upgrades to existing products.

[Trust me, we go your route, be prepared to take A LOT MORE PAIN, I can assure you of that.]

How can you assure me of that when you nor I know the revised ( improved) financial terms? ( I believe the idiq merits much better terms, don't you?) I see less pain/more gain going forward and you see "alot more pain". Surely one of us is not seeing something, let me know what I am missing but only if you truely consider my points. Some of which are:

- IMSC has an inside track via cradas.
- Hand held spec will be new ( canines have to be retrained as do Smiths and Morpho's hand helds)
- the sub. library is already set but it must be upgradeable
- the surface list is already set but it must be extensible.
- and all the other product features that the tsa has published for resolution.

Maybe you are talking about tsa's method of sample acquisition, ie, if the etd collects sample via this method, the device must be so and so far/close to this/that etc. Sure I get that but don't you think IMSC has a headstart via their QS-H150? ( the QS-150-E is the example of a rehabbed product) Sure, some spec. has yet to be disclosed ( guessing) but some things will remain the same.

I want full value for my shares,nothing less. And so far, we shareholders have created & maintained the market for dmrj to recoup their loans and therefore I assume you want full value too. It has to be more than twice the stock's high for the year, in my view, for a sale next week. But in one to two years, three times the high for this year is my pegged full value on the very lowest side.

Good Luck to ALL IMSC LONGS!

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.