InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 88
Posts 5985
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/19/2007

Re: None

Thursday, 12/04/2014 12:05:59 PM

Thursday, December 04, 2014 12:05:59 PM

Post# of 97093
The Parameters are given I would guess: (Taken from the Report S wrote this morning)


6. I postulate that DECN has found one of these old unresolved cases and intends to turn the tables on J&J by acquiring the technology from a very upset inventor, and dropping the stink bomb on J&J because that will make it all about money and J&J understands money. I do not know if this is what DECN has in mind, for all I know DECN wants a cash settlement more than J&J does. But by spurning J&J's offer of mediation and offering something reasonable in return, something J&J would never accept until the last possible moment, and maybe not even then, DECN has made themselves relevant and at this juncture gained the upper hand.

Patent infringement defendant turning the tables and becoming patent infringement plaintiff with added allegations in an already scary anti-trust case is as powerful a move as there is. And in my opinion (and hope) DECN has done something like this and we are days or a few short weeks from finding out. My partner pegged DECN's current case at about $50-$75 million and then triple damages. If they use this turn the tables ploy, which by the way my partner says has never failed, something brilliantly conceived from the past, long before the advent of patent trolls, my partner believes this case could turn into one for the ages --- built on a foundation of J&J arrogance and hubris. Remember, evil always gets way ahead early, but good catches up and wins in the end. Bold is great, epic is better.