Gary
No offense, but I'd like to know your source. I am sincerely interested in confirming that the 50% reduction in revs applies "soley" to the discontinuation of operations. Its an important detail because a reduction in last years revs, under standard investment strategy, should be expected to continue this year unless it can be pubicly explained. If the reduction in revs is not publically addressed, we as investors do not know if the "core" business is decreasing or growing. Growth through acquisition is good but CBQI must also,IMHO, demonstrate an ability to grow w/o acquisition to become successful at convincing potential investors they will get a return on their investment. Where is this sorce? It is critical information to make the projections you keep asking me to make. Your IR so you must have a source. If it is not disclosed for a reason, you ought not say what you have sid. The PRs do not get into addressing this detail.
On a personal note:
Insinuating that I am selectively biased for NOT blindly following your comments is a bold misrepresentation of my admissions. Meet me in the parking lot. I'll be waiting.
BTW: Dont know where you got your information, but I am not restricted to a certain number of posts per day. After you deleted my posts, IH Admin advised me they condone censorship of "negative" posts and asked that I post less than 5 times per day for one week to be assured I was not harrassing anyone. That was at a time that I was responding to 20 posts individually. I think I made around 10-20 posts that week. That was over a month ago.
AI
