InvestorsHub Logo

nez

Followers 17
Posts 1789
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/19/2006

nez

Re: puppman post# 4347

Friday, 04/28/2006 7:17:54 AM

Friday, April 28, 2006 7:17:54 AM

Post# of 15806
My cousin and I were speaking about what was the best alternative over the Easter weekend. He is with a company that is involved with the longshoreman and provide security in the ports. I am from the airline industry and I am going to school for one last degree that will allow me to get into the airport security buisness. I told him about E-85 and gave my views. He on the other hand said that his observations were that there seemed to be more use of LPG at the moment. I explained that the airlines and trucking industries have been using LPG for quite a while but when security audits are done, LPG bottle and refilling point security were almost always on the top list. He had no comment but was thoughtful. Then he brought up the idea that the turbine engine (jet) was really getting big on ships. I asked what he thought they ran on and he was surprised to find out they ran on what is high quality diesil fuel, JP 3 or 4 what ever.
The point is that until people understand ALL of the issues surrounding E-85, they will be hesitant. Thus my excitment when I see such a wide educational/advertizing campaign happening even in politics. It's just a matter of time and we are more than 3/4 of the way to the beginning of the E-85 changeover revolution, IMHO! He too agreed and I ended up giving him information on XLPI! Security must be brought into any debate and the security required for gasoline is of almost no difference to E-85. On the other hand, LPG isn't. Security and storage are most likely more cummbersome and expensive than gasoline and E-85. All of this is as usual, JMO. Nez



Any society that would give up a little liberty to gain a little security will deserve neither and lose both.
Benjamin Franklin