I enjoy your point of view but the stream of irrational abuse, defamation and harassment must stop. Please do not send me any more private messages, your comments are obviously intended to cause harm and they serve no other purpose.
Your latest assertion that LVVV and ADIA are only losers because of me is astonishing. In your mind the shares of both companies are valuable and people should buy them, when you're alleging that I am unfit to be in business and that the whole family of companies would be good investments if only I weren't involved in them, but when it doesn't help you to disparage and defame me then you go right back to asserting that the companies are all worthless and anyone who buys the shares is going to lose their money.
I was justifiably concerned about creating a sale of ADIA to LVVV that would possibly result in the ADIA shareholders (myself included) being future sellers of fundamentally worthless LVVV stock.
Short sellers can profit by being right about how worthless something is, there's absolutely nothing wrong with that in my opinion, but it is wrong to sell a company (or to lend money to a company, as I believe you have done, Curt.) in exchange for a short position in the company's shares. This is not just "toxic" it is criminally-illegal insider trading. If you don't believe me, call the FBI and ask them yourself.
When there is substantial doubt about the legitimacy of LVVV as an investment security, as there was last year and still was when I agreed to appoint Bill Hodson CEO of ADIA in January, the only way forward (if the majority stakeholders in ADIA insist on a merger with LVVV, which they did) is to ensure that the companies merge slowly.
Permitting ADIA shareholders to dump LVVV shares after a 6-month holding period would have been fraudulent, in my opinion. I have already made it clear that the ADIA shareholders should file a lawsuit against me if they disagree. I stand by my decision to step aside in January based on the promises that were made.
It is totally irrelevant that the ADIA shareholders might have been empowered to dump LVVV shares back in July if a sale of ADIA to LVVV had occurred in January, and your assertion that my decision not to create such an outcome somehow deprived LVVV shareholders of value is ridiculous.
Did I deprive the ADIA shareholders of the opportunity to profit by helping to crush LVVV by dumping free-trading shares starting in July? Absolutely. Purposefully. I would do so again without hesitation. The LVVV shares were obviously not capable of holding the value of an ADIA/LVVV merger unless the ADIA stakeholders provided LVVV with a substantial amount of new capital.
Thus, the only non-fraudulent way to sell ADIA to LVVV was for LVVV to issue Warrants, in which case the ADIA stakeholders who wanted to provide LVVV with new capital could acquire shares for cash and then start liquidating after a 6 month holding period (if LVVV had properly disclosed the existence and exercise of the Warrants issued to ADIA).
Your assertion that my unwillingness to help the ADIA stakeholders (Shelly) crush the LVVV Common stockholders with future sales of worthless free-trading stock makes me unfit or unqualified is outrageous and legally actionable. Please stop. Seriously.
I am still waiting for a response from the attorney for Shelly and Bill. Circumstances and timing suggest that maybe Shelly was granted shares by Bill in January after all, illegitimately, with the help of Dick Weed, and maybe Shelly is the seller who crushed LVVV along with you, Curt. If so, I hope Shelly is sent back to prison, and for longer than 9 months this time.
