Politics and Money

[DesertDrifter]

well, unless federal charges are filed, i guess we will never know what the "truth" is. when the prosecution is the one controlling the information in front of the grand jury and are part of the same law enforcement team there as the defendant, why don't you tell us how many times that "leaks" and repetitious demonizing statements that criminalized the victim occurred, while your FOX outfit was reporting that the cop had a broken eye socket, etc, all lies.... as always, you fall for the con line, like an obedient sheep.

The prosecution needed to speak for the dead victim, instead,they made a farce of it by protecting the cop at every turn. The standard was probable cause, not conviction of guilt, and the rules of evidence are different between the two, but that is probably too complex for you. I don't know what the "truth" is any more than you do, but that doesn't stop you from jacking your jaws in the least.

and certainly, finding articles that support your confirmation bias is in this case pretty lame.