No leaders I have ever read have questioned this. If you can show me evidence of his willful deception I'll send you the address of the DNC.
British MP Michael Portillo has questions:
When challenged about the failure to find any weapons so far, the Prime Minister looked pained. Couldn't we understand that since the victory the priority had been to re-establish security for Iraqis and restore their essential services, rather than hunt around for weapons that could wait to be found till a later date? I, for one, find it difficult to understand. I remember the Prime Minister compellingly arguing that the greatest danger of all was that the fearful biological and chemical devices would fall into the hands of al-Qa'ida, to be used against our cities. With such a clear and present danger, would not finding and securing the weapons and laboratories be a priority at least equal to restoring law and order? Has al-Qa'ida assured us that it will allow us a few months to get our act together, before it shops around in Iraq?
How many years are you willing to give them before you decide there are no WMD?
CT