bigjo, all my posts explaining and replying to people are immediately deleted, over 20 in a few days for no reason. So better be quick in reading this. LOL.
Deleting all posts analyzing a poor 10Q makes the moderators look guilty, imo. After all the Q is there for all to read. Do the homework and you will see why the price is falling.
Deleting posts only shows fear that truth will be revealed, imo. But many people want to see how others work formulas. What are the moderators afraid of hearing. Holding too many shares and getting emotional and bent out of shape if another opinion is stated does not help the board.
Deleting and censorship makes people look guilty. The price is falling even with all my posts being deleted. Some want to hear. A public forum is for discussion. And people ask me questions, so they deserve to choose.
Look, I agree with you. The point is that CC will take a year to rollout. But the cost per sub is alot. This does not help revenue much.
Net Loss will rise during growth but sub growth cannot keep up.
Take even the high end of 2,500 per month added. This still places them well below what is needed for 2006. And 2,500 is too much of a stretch. But run it on the high end of GZFX estimates if you must to feel better. I choose to be realistic.
So take a number much higher than 666 per month, that is okay.
Use 1 sub per week per store ( what they have now with the pilot stores at best ).
Do the numbers and tell me what you get for 2006.
It will grow 2007 and beyond IF they remain in business.
What would happen if CC decides they do not need GZFX anymore? Only fools say something is for sure.
My issue is with Net Loss climbing much higher than revenue.
Net Loss, Sub Count and Cost Per Sub tells the story.
As they take more money to grow, the share price dilutes.
Just be realistic about where revenue is coming from. Each Q, people say, oh the next will be better. Problem is Net Loss rises sharply. The cash from selling shares to market is used to remain in business.
