InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 958
Posts 78620
Boards Moderated 6
Alias Born 02/01/2005

Re: None

Thursday, 04/27/2006 11:51:33 AM

Thursday, April 27, 2006 11:51:33 AM

Post# of 79921
So how is this not logical?

Pan says:
"Fact: 250 into 887 gives a revenue number per share at 28 cents".

Question: why if these numbers are correct... wouldn't PA announce the O/S at the same time he gives us $250mil rev's and a buyback of 110mil?

What a perfect time to let investors [who are still skeptical of why PA gaged the T/A] to give us three equations.

Rev's $250mil
Outstanding ?
Which gives us....._____

You see the fact is I've never bashed the company as an entity, it's always been the way PA presents himself and the company PUBICALLY! His personal way of doing business is and will be successful, I've stated that. But is PUBLIC DISPLAY [secretive non-transparent] is POO POO and more than most savvy investors can handle.

PA doesn't think things through before a PR regarding how investors see he's presenting his company PUBICALLY!

This last PR was a great time for PA to come clean on what he's been hiding for sometime. Once he comes clean will investors who are trying to figure out the OS/Float, invest? I'd give it about a 50/50 chance!

Temp'

the problem is with some people on this board is that they're marriage to PA reminds me of a whipping post, not good!

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.