InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 61
Posts 7519
Boards Moderated 2
Alias Born 02/10/2010

Re: Rawnoc post# 104345

Friday, 11/21/2014 11:35:08 AM

Friday, November 21, 2014 11:35:08 AM

Post# of 146201
Nope,... not that either,.....

Reckless.



Reckless would be to get in here without understanding how the 'Cides work, not understanding how the chemistry works, not understanding what it takes to get a production facility online and running, or what was required in order to get a good clinical trial underway.

Reckless would be to show up 'here' and not understand that there is always risk where there is potential reward,.... and to get overextended. Never bet the rent money and all that.

Reckless would be to ignore the history of missed deadlines here (which I don't ignore) and not realize that most of that 'fear' has already be subsumed in current shareprices as evidence of some of the risk that remains.

Reckless would be to look at the past only, and not realize that some significant things here haven't changed and for the better of late,.... and yet maintain the same 'song & dance' of often clearly incorrect information that gets distributed around here.

In other words,.... not reckless at all.

It does remain a reasonable possibility that the company will end up going nowhere,.... that's built into my investment strategy here. The probability of going 'nowhere' drops every time a milestone is met here.

But it also remains a bigger probability (IMO of course) that TOX will get completed with flying colors for Flucide, and the IND will get filed, and the Shelton plant will go online, and all the production limitations will get overcome, and even that some combination of ligands will work against Ebola,....

Those who do not see this,... probably should be invested elsewhere,....
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent NNVC News