Corner- good insights! A strategic shorter plays into dmrj's ongoing selling also and even makes money the way this stock pops and drops, slowly rises then recedes.
So the counter to that would be a strategic buy-in with the shares locked up for a set period of time. Say a L-3 buys 18.75M shares and pays $3 each ( yeah I know, why would they do that), the only reason for them to do that is to insure all the loose ends are cleaned up (dmrj goes away, bam goes away) and IMSC could make a deal that when the stock price gets to $5.01, those shares unlock freeing that buyer to move further toward taking out IMSC or selling their shares at a fair profit. The goal- get IMSC capital structure clean enough for uplisting, fund their R/D to allow more rapid product development and block competitors from capturing the FLAG, so to speak.
To my mind, other deals are more complicated, keeps IMSC in the same boat ( sure a smaller debt boat ) and still stymies rapid product advancement.
I think its clear: anyone else in etd has to really figure out something new because IMSC holds the science lead, the relationship lead and is stretching its marketing reach over the entire globe ( tip of cap to Dr. Jones).
That makes sense to me. What do you think?
Best of Better Luck to ALL IMSC LONGS!
