InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 11
Posts 1516
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 10/20/2014

Re: buffalop51 post# 18635

Wednesday, 11/19/2014 3:40:46 PM

Wednesday, November 19, 2014 3:40:46 PM

Post# of 47873
Buffalo-- I am trying to understand your point re: dmrj and mgt. trying to keep the share price low-- how is anybody, inclusive of other shareholders served by that? To my mind, that makes no sense.

Ceo wants the stock higher. Much higher. He has "options to buy" priced in the $1.40 range.

Dmrj I assume does not care about the price they gain from the interest payment shares they convert at 8 cents. They just want those shares sold as quickly as they get them. And that makes dmrj NOT a shareholder.

Further, to fully value IMSC per-buyout, they need other products, products that tsa wants so much they are paying for their development.

I would like to see dmrj exit the stock the week before IMSC submits a quality data package on their conveyor etd system and or their new hypenated hand held etd that delivers a much higher resolution that either the B-220 or the QS-H150. It is not a mythological product as some Qs have shown it as the QS- 150E and before that as the QS-Hx. We know its close at hand. I think their "second tsa act/submission" is the catalytic event that triggers a buy out.

Best of Better Luck to ALL IMSC LONGS!

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.