National Energy Services Inc. (fka NESV)

[ENRTfan]

Call me greedy maybe.

Not greedy, UNREALISTIC and probably inexperienced. Definitely unrealistic.

For those who have been here a year with a much higher buy in price because when they bought the stock at .045 because this thing was "gonna be trading at .25 minimum by the summer

A year ago this was in the triple 0's, not at .045. When I was told about this about 7 months ago it wasn't at .045. My first buy was in the low .03 range.

Anyone who believes an anonymous poster on an anonymous chat board that a .01 stock is going to a quarter is a fool. This is where inexperience comes into play.

200/1 nobody should be "happy", "excited" or "enthusiastic" about what this company is doing.

You were warned of the impending Reverse Split almost a month before the Shareholder Meeting. You had the ability to go to the shareholder meeting and contest the split in person, or do so in writing. You had the ability to sell your shares at anytime after the shareholder meeting knowing that the majority of shareholders voted in favour of the Reverse. Inexperience or something prevented you from doing this.

I'm sorry, but taking this down to .015 then splitting to hit the 3.00 requirement is NOT taking care if your shareholders. Get this thing higher than what it has been trading at in the past, then split. You make sure your "investors" are taken care of.

More inexperience. Companies that make "sure" that their stock price is at a certain point are violating anti-manipulation laws. You make it sound like NASV intentionally dropped the price of the stock in this. That is completely ludicrous.

if you didn't buy at this level, and if you bought where I did, this thing will have to raise 400% (after the split) to start seeing ANY profit.

You bought at the wrong time and in one piece. More inexperience. NEVER EVER buy all you are going to at once. At very least I stage in 3 buys... 50% of the money allotted for the first one, then 2 more at 25%. This way when things go wrong (which is very frequent in pennies) you have the ability to average down.

Your math is great for somebody who buys all their shares at a .012pps. Then of course, any gain profit.

The math is also solid for this pps regardless of where you bought. Later in your statement you say the pps has to go up 400% for you to make any money. My question is this: Which method will it be easier for this particular company to regain that 400%? With 800,000,000 shares outstanding and a price of .015 and on the OTCMarkets? OR With 4,000,000 shares outstanding and a price of 3.00 and on the NYSE Markets?

The 2nd situation would allow for mutual funds and other institutional investors to come in. They don't buy $500 in stock. Their "small time" would be in excess of $50,000. Other than one or two investors in NAS nobody will be willing to put that kind of cash into a penny stock.

So now I order to break even and see any profit, we will have to see this stock start hitting the $6,8 ,9 even 10 dollar range. Impossible? No!

Once the company gets to NYSE Markets this scenario is very very likely. The P/E ratios of 18 - 30 are normal for NYSE level companies in NASV's situation. OTC Markets level have P/E ratios of 2 or less. Staying on the OTC by not doing a reverse is death. Slow painful death.

But again, being that this stock has say between .03 and .04 most of the year, shouldn't we make sure that is where we are (if not higher) before the split? Taking care of out investors who have helped keep the company afloat?

This is exactly my point. How many other investors have you personally scared off with your posts here? How many people have thought, hmm it may be good but he has a point, and not purchased? Are YOU doing this or are you working against the greater good simply by complaining?

Investors dictate what a company is worth not the company itself. The company has a job to do, and that's to make money and communicate with shareholders. There are certain times that they are not allowed to communicate by regulation, before shareholder meetings, before dividends and splits etc. This way the company is not persuading shareholders. It is up to US to get the message out to others that the company is good and growing.

200/1 at this level is no good. I don't care what you say!

Of course you don't. That is inexperience at its finest.