InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 8
Posts 241
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 10/17/2014

Re: zerosum post# 14060

Monday, 11/17/2014 5:41:20 PM

Monday, November 17, 2014 5:41:20 PM

Post# of 57894
You have to put things in perspective. The trial lease of both TC and KM is relatively short and cost them a small call option to test a technology. It is trivial to them, as they might be involved with countless other oil service companies to test different sorts of technologies. TC and KM also never made a big deal of this in terms of news releases or 8-k, only STWA did, because it is their only life line. Transcanada is out, which clearly creates serious doubt about the commercial viability of the AOT.

If Halliburton or other oil companies know the technology well, as some of you claimed, why wouldn't they have pulled the plug? Because they first want to await commercial viability? If they are unsure, what gives you the confidence that orders will come in. What do you know what they don't? No third party institute has resolutely claimed that oil viscocity can be achieved in a commercial viability fashion. Even Rand never claimed that STWA's technology was sufficient. If power supply was the issue for the TC lease, then they had sufficient time to adjust that, if TC was seriously interested in continued testing.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent QSEP News