InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 39
Posts 707
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/10/2006

Re: kermit4karate post# 157561

Tuesday, 04/25/2006 9:32:33 PM

Tuesday, April 25, 2006 9:32:33 PM

Post# of 286279
No, Kermit, the low sub count was always the concern. Read the posts. I stated several times that O/S's cannot go more than A/S's.

Check the date. Many more from same time telling you what to expect.

Posted by: ChicagoStock
In reply to: big_money_insiders who wrote msg# 147224 Date:4/10/2006 3:27:54 PM
Post #of 157457

BMI, so your saying JAN FEB MAR only 2500 additional subs? That's 833/mon less then the est of 1-2.5k...

6k was as of Dec 31, 05.

CS

Actually, I was wrong, it came in much less thn 833/mo !!!


The following Q's will reflect the Dilution as stated numerous times.

Do not put words in my mouth.

TO DATE and future Dillution is the concern. Sub count is terribly low.

Please explain only 666 subs added per month when JF and Chip said 1,500-2,500 in the last filing.

In fact, every time I would say subs around 8,000-10,000, people would hammer me.

Please explain only 666 sub count added per month when SPENDING INCREASED 135 % into the millions !!

Sure someone can explain how Spending increasing 135% and 666 subs per month can make this work ??????

* keep the posts about GZFX and not diverting to the poster. I know the Q disappointed many, but do not take it out on me.