InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 200
Posts 10576
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 11/29/2011

Re: FullDeck post# 77300

Saturday, 11/15/2014 3:07:02 PM

Saturday, November 15, 2014 3:07:02 PM

Post# of 92705
Could be a ho-hum week for anti- Moffitt (and anti-RIGH) crowds...

Just a heads up...

The SEC's rules are clear. The theory on any Kelso wrongdoings in RIGH are completely false. The SEC's charges vs. Drake are bold and follow the below rules, which do not apply to RIGH, as the number of RIGH shareholders are circa 100 or less.

A company must file reports with the SEC if:

it has 2,000 or more investors or more than 500 investors that do not qualify as 'accredited investors,' and $10 million or more in assets; or

it lists its securities on any 'national securities exchange,'; or

its securities are quoted on the OTCBB or in the OTCQB marketplace of OTC Link; or it has registered an offering of its securities under the Securities Act of 1933 and has more than 300 holders of record or more than 1,200 holders of record if a bank or bank holding company.


http://www.sec.gov/investor/pubs/microcapstock.htm

The above boo-boo is what got Drake private investors in deep water.

Drake has 1,697 shareholders to RIGH's last reported 84 - so no harm, no foul in pinky land.
http://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/righ/profile

One theory here is correct,


"Moffitt is probably more professional, and may play the game better."



Therefore, the aforementioned concerns do not apply to RIGH.

BN