InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
AI Subscribe Login/Register account icon
S&P 500
5,468.37
(
1.28%
)
US TECH 100
18,527.60
(
1.07%
)
Dow Jones
40,667.53
(
1.83%
)
Brent Oil
80.29
(
-1.53%
)
Bitcoin
67,549.78
(
2.68%
)
Post# of 12758
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Next 10 Prev Next

KGuzzetta

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 17
Posts 700
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/11/2014

KGuzzetta

Re: danielf706 post# 3783

Friday, 11/14/2014 7:23:30 PM

Friday, November 14, 2014 7:23:30 PM

Post# of 12758
"Should". Key word. I'm not denying that it is a great report. However "should" doesn't make us money. 9 months ago the "should" was that this will be trading at .25 by this past summer. (Because it was was under valued when it was .04). Now it's .014 and the "should" is the the report "should" move the price up a little.

It was also that this company "should" be up listed by years end. Actually I believe it was "would" be up listed by then, though I really do t see that happening.

Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Next 10 Prev Next
Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up