Wednesday, November 12, 2014 8:28:58 AM
In https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B_ch8gAs4lCcUk9VaHZrZ2lLbUg5emRGSjhJQkJaNktuUmFZ/view
the judge writes, "In Section VI.B, the Court ruled in favor of the Defendants on their defense that the '858 patent family was invalid pursuant to the on-sale bar found in 35 U.S.C. 102(b) ...".
This language gives the appearance that the sole reason for ordering the SJ was violation of the on-sale bar.
FEATURED Cannabix Technologies Launches New Compact Breath Logix Workplace Series and Prepares for Delivery to South Africa • May 7, 2024 8:51 AM
NanoViricides Reports that the Phase I NV-387 Clinical Trial is Completed Successfully and Data Lock is Expected Soon • NNVC • May 2, 2024 10:07 AM
ILUS Files Form 10-K and Provides Shareholder Update • ILUS • May 2, 2024 8:52 AM
Avant Technologies Names New CEO Following Acquisition of Healthcare Technology and Data Integration Firm • AVAI • May 2, 2024 8:00 AM
Bantec Engaged in a Letter of Intent to Acquire a Small New Jersey Based Manufacturing Company • BANT • May 1, 2024 10:00 AM
Cannabix Technologies to Deliver Breath Logix Alcohol Screening Device to Australia • BLO • Apr 30, 2024 8:53 AM