the second half of your post was reasonable, but shorter versions were already stated:
post 55743
different indications for their science are there. unfortunately, ariad is still a small player in the field, with financial limitation. being able to move those indications forward, without diluting the share price any further, is a concerning obstacle. I'm sure the higher ups are aware of that financial burden. logic should prevail.
or post 55754
with a good financial backing, ariads potential pipeline is attractive. hopefully, one of these mornings the headlines will read that a major player in the pharmaceutical field, has approached ariad as an interested party. don't even need the buyout headline. the interested party headline alone, will get this stock moving in the right direction. hope you get the math, harvey!...financial logic should prevail.
or post 55800
"very egotistical and hard headed person", might be putting it lightly. in the next few months, there will be ongoing discussions behind the scenes solely directed towards the future of ariad. if harvey continues to be exposed by choosing his power monger status, over reasonable and financially sound outcomes for the company, there will most certain be a rift between him and his cohorts. and unlike the last backlash of directors, at this stage of the game, another internal rift may be to great for the ceo to successfully over come, if he ends up on top. financial logic for all invested parties should prevail.
etc.
forget the silliness of the m.b.…financial logic should prevail
