InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 371
Posts 5975
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 05/19/2011

Re: N4longterm post# 211395

Monday, 11/10/2014 9:11:54 AM

Monday, November 10, 2014 9:11:54 AM

Post# of 232508
So you think the buyer should pay for things that don't exist? The buyer should complain if any of the free advertized widgets aren't real.......... Get it? There is no 50% savings on anything when it's not real, air, or fake.............................

Let's see if I can make a outside of the box excample of this latest NOBO news-

What if I'm in the business of buying small warehouses full of widgets and I wanted to buy this warehouse (KMA Global) and my purchase price is based on the seller stating there are 750 million widgets (Shares) in that warehouse. So I hire a firm (Broadridge) to do a inventory count of widgets in this warehouse to make sure I'm getting what I'm paying for. Now during the DD of the sales agreement documents, they find a paper that says there is 1,000,000 Billion widgets in this building, but during inventory Broadridge can only locate and touch 750 million real widgets in the inventory. Well being the buyer, I don't want to pay for the extra 300 million widgets they can't find or that don't exist. So I tell the seller of the warehouse that I can only verify there are 750 million widgets under roof and that's all I'm paying for in the deal. The seller then says they only produced 750 million widgets total and it's a good thing I had Broadridge check to make sure the 750 million widgets were still in the inventory. The seller said the extra 300 million widgets listed on that paper must of been a typo "Produced out of thin air". Sure don't want anything crooked in this deal, do we..............BOOM!

Bad example, does not apply at all. If the seller thinks there are only X# of widgets, why would the buyer complain about getting 50% more for free??