InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 50
Posts 2457
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 05/15/2012

Re: None

Sunday, 11/09/2014 6:29:08 PM

Sunday, November 09, 2014 6:29:08 PM

Post# of 290030
About “Edible Garden” Brand as Trademark !!
Edible Garden Trademark Registration - Filing Date February 19, 2013
of a Word Trademark by the official protest publication as without
any protests already made :
http://tmsearch.uspto.gov/bin/showfield?f=doc...w27hek.2.2
TRTC - Edible Garden Trademark Reg. - Filing Date October 11, 2013
of a Word & Picture Trademark, by the official publication for any
may possible protest not yet made :
http://tmsearch.uspto.gov/bin/showfield?f=doc...w27hek.2.1
Edible Garden is a weak principally not so protect-able
Trademark or Brand, because the two words are natural
commonly used words and not of any intellectual origin !
( Not as strong as intellectually invented „Pepsi “ or „Coke“ )
It means, because not a strong TRTC Trademark and they
say like to create a „National Brand“, that about anybody
could use the same and they could not do much about it !

Now we need to consider, that TRTC did above Word Trademark
„Edible Garden“ of February 19, 2013 use to register a company
by the name „Edible Garden Corp.“ . This is a classical Trademark
infringement which by any possible Lawsuit against TRTC by usual
US Standards could cost TRTC between $ 200 - 500 Mn !!
All of this because the stupid Vande Vrede Family did for over
40 Years of Business, as they say, just forget about the simple
Trademark Registration which usually does not cost more than
about $ 1000.- if made by some Trademark & Patent Attorney !
.

Dhar Mann Lawsuit against Peterson & GrowOp Ltd. !!
In July 2012 Dhar Mann & Peterson by two publications they
confirmed again to have Freedom & Not Any Disputes between
the two, but at the CA Court the Case never got annulated and
this means Dhar Mann can anytime change his opinion to activate
The Court Case and since not even the very first Court Action in
presence of the Two Parties never was possible to do, means Dhar
Mann could even hand in new claims or evidences as completions
before of any further Court procedure.
We have to remember 2012 where TRTC made a loss of $ 5,8 Mn
and GrowOp just to get rid-off some Equipments and Accessories
sold with 40 - 50 % Discount, means also for Dhar Mann claiming
37 % ownership of GrowOp would beside losses not have provided
him anything, contrary.
But now 2014 and where TRTC Peterson is pumping GrowOp with
anything related to MJ and even the big GrowMass Program and
CBD Nutrition Intems, Etc. all is now by the GrowOp Ltd. and with
some MJ Licenses may come if TRTC is very lucky, then even
more Value to be taken by Dhar Mann would be there for him
to change his mind because need money as chronically as all
heard and the 37 % Ownership could costs TRTC nearly
everything if Court Fees, Attorneys Fees, Etc. considered !
The problem Investor side was mentioned to TRTC, but they
refused even to modify all SEC S-1 Filings as since February
2012 and to apply there just the SEC 10-Q wordings where
not anything about a Dhar Mann Lawsuit is mentioned and
TRTC just confirmed, cannot change this.
.

Annual Guidance & Revenues !!
We know from Alan Brochstein - Derek Peterson‘s first interview,
that NB Plants has 2013 Revenues of $ 7 Mn and according by
SEC Deposited Contract between TRTC & NB Plants, TRTC should
have 100 % of all its Products resulting also 100 % of its Revenue
by PRs and thereof TRTC has only a poor Commission of 10 % !
See the link of SEC Deposited Contract TRTC & NB Plants :
http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/145151..._ex102.htm
Annual guidance for 2013 was poor $ 2 Mn and by the leaked
numbers as beaten declared can expect $ 2,2 - 2,3 Mn !
But take the NB Plants $ 7 Mn and for Quarters divide by 4
it as Av. per Q results to $ 1,75 Mn and by this calculating
2013 Q2 as 65 Days ( by Contract Signing of April 25, 2013
in Effect. ) its about $ 0,6 Mn missing, at Q3 about $ 1 Mn
missing and for Q4 also about $ 1 Mn missing, results to
totally $ 2,6 Mn missing in 2013 more than the annual
Revenue will be showing !!

It was with TRTC discussed, but they did not show any interests
to comment or providing an adequate reply to this topic and
in this calculation is not even considered that a similar TRTC
Contract exist also with the GroRite Company, see below link !
http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/145151..._ex101.htm
.