NANT

[Chachagirl]

You are asking good questions. I think it's a combination of factors. The Good Doctor wants to create a paradigm shift in healthcare to include a better path for treating cancer and to treat childhood diseases using the advances in genomics. He has a history of maintaining 80% control so nothing is up for vote - period. That is so important and can not be overstated. With an IPO he could make more money but then he has the tax liability that comes along with that. A reverse merger is classified as a reorganization. He also would likely not have 80% control with an IPO.

Also remember before anything else he is a physician and a humanitarian. He thinks it's silly to be termed "the richest doctor in the world." This is about raising money (no money, no mission) but it's also about creating the paradigm shift and helping people. NANT stands for "he who speaks for the people." I think when you look at the complete picture, it is highly likely some of us random people will financially benefit using this capital raising strategy. Lucky us.