InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 28
Posts 2294
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 04/15/2013

Re: None

Tuesday, 11/04/2014 2:35:24 PM

Tuesday, November 04, 2014 2:35:24 PM

Post# of 129194
Here is a thought, being as sneaky as these guys are; would it be possible that they tried to buy one of the notes back after the conversion date and the holder was being a d-bag because he stood to make more by selling shares than selling back a note. So to be sneaky d-bags themselves, they filed a 1:10 split knowing the price would fall and the holder would get less money? I mean a 1:10 is a small reverse. This stock needs a reverse but at least a 1:100 would make more sense. Then they issued themselves more shares because the holder threatened to hold the max allowed shares, which would put them a larger share holder than tbev insiders. Realize they couldn't issue shares because they had to hold them for a note, and then issued preferred shares to ensure that they maintain control of the company despite the amount of common shares any one holder may have. May have over thought this.