let's talk risk-reward ... most of us are here to make money owning uspr stock ...
2 questions for the mb:
are any shareholders who watched the mike berry presentation OR HAVE READ ABOUT WHAT WAS SAID unhappy with what he had to say ?
any shareholders think this is negative for future shareholder value?
even if there was no gold on the entire rest of the property (which is ridiculously absurd), we know there is $3,000,000,000 in the 11 anomalies.... (2.5 million ounces x $1200 per ounce)
even if there is no more gold on the entire rest of the 37,000 acres - and all the gold on the property is only in those 34 acres (this is past absurd), it still means we know there is $3,000,000,000 in those 34 ares ....
that would make for a $300,000,000 market cap (usually about 10% of the gold assets) ... which would still mean the pps should eventually be over $1 ....
AND THIS IS BASED ON RIDICULOUSLY, GROSSLY UNDERESTIMATED NUMBERS IF YOU ONLY INCLUDE THE 11 ANOMALIES
IF THIS ISN'T THE BEST RISK REWARD SCENARIO EVER .... IMO, ZERO RISK ... BECAUSE WE KNOW THERE ARE TENS OF BILLIONS IN GOLD .... AND THE REWARD COULD BE HIGHER THAN EVEN I THOUGHT ORIGINALLY ... AND I WAS THINKING BETWEEN $10-20 PPS AT BUYOUT
