InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 88
Posts 5985
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/19/2007

Re: Pitt Bully post# 78511

Tuesday, 11/04/2014 3:12:25 AM

Tuesday, November 04, 2014 3:12:25 AM

Post# of 87950
Star-Queens as such must not be disclosed in the filings.

Reason: Star-Queens was a "personal account" of B.S. but registered under the Name of a corporation but within the bank and certainly within the Company known, that the B.O. is B.S.

All what he did: Part of his salary went to an account in his direct Name and part of the salary wen to an account in the name of Star-Queens but under the B.O. of B.S.

Not wrong with this as this and certainly not against the law.

But what would have been against the law, if the Transfers to Star-Queens would not have been salary or Bonus payments. But then, when E.G. released those payments I am pretty sure he knew that this all belongs to the item "salary - Bonus".

And actually, this was even confirmed in some of the court papers. Again, I am not fighting with you about the size of the payments which are "crazy" by all standarts and I am not fighting with you about the "non-paid" taxes, but I try to distinguish between the ethic side of Business and the legal part.

Unless otherwise proven,I do not think that the Star Queen Account and Transfer were illegal.